Managed File Transfer and Network Solutions

Navigation menu

Certificate authority
If the CA can be subverted, then the security of the entire system is lost, potentially subverting all the entities that trust the compromised CA. The RA collects and authenticates digital certificate requests, and then submits those requests to the certificate authority, which then issues the certificate to be passed through the RA to the applicant. This section does not cite any sources. In large-scale deployments, Alice may not be familiar with Bob's certificate authority perhaps they each have a different CA server , so Bob's certificate may also include his CA's public key signed by a different CA 2 , which is presumably recognizable by Alice. The client would accept this and happily begin the handshake. The public key is distributed as part of the certificate, and the private key is kept incredibly safely guarded. According to the American Bar Association outline on Online Transaction Management the primary points of federal and state statutes that have been enacted regarding digital signatures has been to "prevent conflicting and overly burdensome local regulation and to establish that electronic writings satisfy the traditional requirements associated with paper documents.

Report Abuse

certificate authority (CA)

This allowed mail hosts to reserve those addresses for administrative use, though such precautions are still not universal. In January , a Finnish man registered the username "hostmaster" at the Finnish version of Microsoft Live and was able to obtain a domain-validated certificate for live. A CA issues digital certificates that contain a public key and the identity of the owner.

The matching private key is not made available publicly, but kept secret by the end user who generated the key pair. The certificate is also a confirmation or validation by the CA that the public key contained in the certificate belongs to the person, organization, server or other entity noted in the certificate.

A CA's obligation in such schemes is to verify an applicant's credentials, so that users and relying parties can trust the information in the CA's certificates. CAs use a variety of standards and tests to do so. In essence, the certificate authority is responsible for saying "yes, this person is who they say they are, and we, the CA, certify that".

If the user trusts the CA and can verify the CA's signature, then they can also assume that a certain public key does indeed belong to whoever is identified in the certificate. Public-key cryptography can be used to encrypt data communicated between two parties. In this example let us suppose that the user logs on to their bank's homepage www. When the user opens www. The public key could be used to encrypt data from the client to the server but the safe procedure is to use it in a protocol that determines a temporary shared symmetric encryption key; messages in such a key exchange protocol can be enciphered with the bank's public key in such a way that only the bank server has the private key to read them.

The rest of the communication then proceeds using the new disposable symmetric key, so when the user enters some information to the bank's page and submits the page sends the information back to the bank then the data the user has entered to the page will be encrypted by their web browser.

Therefore, even if someone can access the encrypted data that was communicated from the user to www. This mechanism is only safe if the user can be sure that it is the bank that they see in their web browser. If the user types in www. The user will fill the form with their personal data and will submit the page. The fake web-page will then get access to the user's data.

This is what the certificate authority mechanism is intended to prevent. A certificate authority CA is an organization that stores public keys and their owners, and every party in a communication trusts this organization and knows its public key.

When the user's web browser receives the public key from www. The browser already possesses the public key of the CA and consequently can verify the signature, trust the certificate and the public key in it: Since the fake www. This is why commercial CAs often use a combination of authentication techniques including leveraging government bureaus, the payment infrastructure, third parties' databases and services, and custom heuristics.

In some enterprise systems, local forms of authentication such as Kerberos can be used to obtain a certificate which can in turn be used by external relying parties. Notaries are required in some cases to personally know the party whose signature is being notarized; this is a higher standard than is reached by many CAs. According to the American Bar Association outline on Online Transaction Management the primary points of US Federal and State statutes enacted regarding digital signatures has been to "prevent conflicting and overly burdensome local regulation and to establish that electronic writings satisfy the traditional requirements associated with paper documents.

Despite the security measures undertaken to correctly verify the identities of people and companies, there is a risk of a single CA issuing a bogus certificate to an imposter. It is also possible to register individuals and companies with the same or very similar names, which may lead to confusion.

To minimize this hazard, the certificate transparency initiative proposes auditing all certificates in a public unforgeable log, which could help in the prevention of phishing. In large-scale deployments, Alice may not be familiar with Bob's certificate authority perhaps they each have a different CA server , so Bob's certificate may also include his CA's public key signed by a different CA 2 , which is presumably recognizable by Alice.

This process typically leads to a hierarchy or mesh of CAs and CA certificates. An authority revocation list ARL is a form of certificate revocation list CRL containing certificates issued to certificate authorities, contrary to CRLs which contain revoked end-entity certificates. These are a requirement for inclusion in the certificate stores of Firefox [32] and Safari.

If the CA can be subverted, then the security of the entire system is lost, potentially subverting all the entities that trust the compromised CA.

For example, suppose an attacker, Eve, manages to get a CA to issue to her a certificate that claims to represent Alice. That is, the certificate would publicly state that it represents Alice, and might include other information about Alice.

Some of the information about Alice, such as her employer name, might be true, increasing the certificate's credibility. Eve, however, would have the all-important private key associated with the certificate. Eve could then use the certificate to send digitally signed email to Bob, tricking Bob into believing that the email was from Alice. Bob might even respond with encrypted email, believing that it could only be read by Alice, when Eve is actually able to decrypt it using the private key.

A notable case of CA subversion like this occurred in , when the certificate authority VeriSign issued two certificates to a person claiming to represent Microsoft. The certificates have the name "Microsoft Corporation", so they could be used to spoof someone into believing that updates to Microsoft software came from Microsoft when they actually did not.

The fraud was detected in early Microsoft and VeriSign took steps to limit the impact of the problem. In fraudulent certificates were obtained from Comodo and DigiNotar , [36] [37] allegedly by Iranian hackers. There is evidence that the fraudulent DigiNotar certificates were used in a man-in-the-middle attack in Iran. In , it became known that Trustwave issued a subordinate root certificate that was used for transparent traffic management man-in-the-middle which effectively permitted an enterprise to sniff SSL internal network traffic using the subordinate certificate.

An attacker who steals a certificate authority's private keys is able to forge certificates as if they were CA, without needed ongoing access to the CA's systems. Key theft is therefore one of the main risks certificate authorities defend against. Publicly trusted CAs almost always store their keys on a hardware security module HSM , which allows them to sign certificates with a key, but generally prevent extraction of that key with both physical and software controls.

CAs typically take the further precaution of keeping the key for their long-term root certificates in an HSM that is kept offline , except when it is needed to sign shorter-lived intermediate certificates. The intermediate certificates, stored in an online HSM, can do the day-to-day work of signing end-entity certificates and keeping revocation information up to date. CAs sometimes use a key ceremony when generating signing keys, in order to ensure that the keys are not tampered with or copied.

The critical weakness in the way that the current X. Such certificates will be accepted as valid by the trusting party whether they are legitimate and authorized or not. As all major web browsers are distributed to their end-users pre-configured with a list of trusted CAs that numbers in the dozens this means that any one of these pre-approved trusted CAs can issue a valid certificate for any domain whatsoever.

Various software is available to operate a certificate authority. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources.

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. September Learn how and when to remove this template message. Archived from the original on Alex Halderman 12 September The Internet Measurement Conference.

Archived PDF from the original on 22 December Retrieved 20 December A Directory by Any Other Name. Collapse the table of content. This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. The term PKI or public key infrastructure strikes fear into the hearts of many network administrators. But, in reality, network administrators should draw comfort from the thought of PKI, knowing that it provides a secure means of communication on their network.

In public key cryptography, a pair of associated keys—one public and one private—are used for encrypting and signing data. Simply put, the data is encrypted with one of these keys and decrypted with the other. If, for example, I want to send a signed e-mail, my mail program creates a one-way hash of my message, which I encrypt using my private key.

The recipient then uses my public key to verify the signature, ensuring that the e-mail was actually sent by me. I can send my public key to any individuals who need it, while I keep my private key well guarded.

If you deploy an application that is PKI aware and you want to make use of the security capabilities offered by PKI, you will need Certificate Services. This is used to manage the lifecycle of certificates for the applications and accounts that require them.

It covers the request, issuance, enrollment, publication, maintenance, revocation, and expiration of certificates. Certificate Services also provides information assurance, meaning that measures are taken to safeguard aspects of information and information systems. This is done by ensuring authentication, confidentiality, integrity, and nonrepudiation. After you decide what types of PKI-enabled applications you are going to deploy, you have to decide which accounts will make use of these applications—thus, determining which accounts or security principals will be issued certificates.

A security principal is the subject of the issued certificate. It can consist of computers, services, and users.

A computer or user receives a certificate to establish its unique identity with PKI-aware applications. Services, meanwhile, use certificates to identify themselves on the network and authenticate themselves to other services, computers, or users. There are a variety of applications and technologies that are PKI compatible. Here are some common uses of PKI and certificates. Secure Internet Used for authentication between a client and server, while encrypting the communication between the client and server.

IPSec Enables the creation of an authenticated communications channel between two systems, as well as the encryption of traffic once the session is established.

Secure E-Mail Verifies the sender and ensures the message has not been tampered with in transit. Smart Card Logon Provides two-factor authentication to provide an additional layer of security in which the user must have the smart card and know the PIN associated with it. Software Code Signing Provides signing and authorization of code both drivers and applications. Software Restriction Policy Provides a mechanism that can be used to prevent programs that are not authorized from being executed.

A digital certificate is an electronic credential that is based on a standard schema such as X. It consists of a variety of properties, such as who the certificate is granted to Subject , the expiration date Valid to , and what certificate authority it was granted by Issuer.

Certificates can be used for several purposes. In some instances, you may want a single certificate to map to an individual user account—this is known as one-to-one mapping.

Alternatively, you might want a many-to-one mapping, in which multiple certificates are issued to a single user account for several purposes. A certificate server issues a certificate based on who or what requested the certificate.

The client computer generates the public and private keys. The CA verifies the identity of the requestor and that the requested certificate is valid for the given requestor. If the requested certificate is permitted, the CA signs the public key and binds it to a certificate. Finally, the CA issues and manages the certificate until it is revoked or expires. An actual certificate can be stored in one of several locations depending on how it is going to be used.

If, for instance, a certificate is being used for a smart card, then it is stored right on the smart card. The first step in planning an implementation is to determine its scope and purpose. Then you can decide on the types of certificates it will require and how your CA hierarchy should be structured. Generally, certificate hierarchies are three levels deep, consisting of an offline root CA, a policy or intermediate CA, and the issuing CAs see Figure 1. The specifics, however, depend on the details of your overall deployment.

CAs can be one of either two types: A standalone CA, on the other hand, does not require communication with Active Directory and can be removed from the network.

An environment can contain a mixture of enterprise and standalone CAs. The root CA is often standalone while the issuing CAs are enterprise to facilitate user requests for certificates the policy CAs are frequently either standalone or enterprise. The root CA is the first server, or top level, in the CA hierarchy. A root CA can self-sign its own root certificate or use a certificate from a third party. Requests made to the root CA are automatically approved or denied based on the requestor and the permissions associated with the certificate template.

Certificate requests to an enterprise root CA can be made by the Certificate Request Wizard or by the certification authority Web page. A standalone CA does not require Active Directory and is typically removed from the network to become an offline root CA to maintain a higher level of security.

All certificate requests made to a standalone CA must be approved or denied manually by the designated certificate manager.

Will certificate transparency help prevent bogus certificates from circulating?

Leave a Reply