Turn Private Browsing on or off on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch

Latest developments in Apple/FBI privacy battle

How to Make Text Messages & iMessages Private on iPhone 8/X
That's just the theory, but there's plenty of practical evidence to back it up: I am skeptic with this king of tools but I was wrong. Hiding stuff from the nephews on my phone will be very difficult now that I have switched from Android to Apple. Doing so will bring up a keypad. I feel the pain. October 30, at 3: The "X" will be the number of photos you selected.

Video of the Day

How to Hide Photos on iPhone in a Locked & Private Photo Album (UPDATED FOR iOS 11)

Samsung is way better at hiding photos! They have a private profile that stays private until you enter your four digit pin. Really wish Apple would do the same! Hiding stuff from the nephews on my phone will be very difficult now that I have switched from Android to Apple. There are several apps that are password protected for hiding sensitive images or photos of sensitive data.

What am I doing wrong? Mail will not be published required. Reproduction without explicit permission is prohibited. Enter your email address below: October 30, at 7: October 30, at 9: August 22, at 8: December 12, at 2: December 22, at 1: October 30, at 3: October 30, at 5: September 21, at 9: October 23, at 1: October 30, at 8: November 21, at 8: February 20, at 3: March 8, at 3: April 20, at 2: May 3, at 5: December 23, at 9: June 23, at 9: August 5, at 9: August 13, at August 15, at 8: Apple has talked about the importance of data privacy many, many times the past, but this is the clearest statement yet that the company is prepared to take concrete action for that principle.

I personally feel that Cook has been outmanoeuvred to a certain extent. It's about the worst case on which to make a stand that you could imagine: Sure enough, a Pew Research Center poll found that 51 percent of Americans think Apple should hack the phone, compared to 35 percent who think it should not.

And it's the worst time: But this makes the move even more admirable. I don't think Apple is doing this because it's a good strategic move - although caring about your customers is a pretty good business model that's served Apple well over the years - but because it believes this is the right thing to do.

Lots of tech companies talk about privacy, and indeed in this case many other major tech firms, including Microsoft and even Google, have come out in solidarity with Apple's stance. But there's a difference between saying and doing. I also couldn't help but notice that there was a fair gap between Apple's statement and most the supportive comments, as if they were looking to see who else would commit themselves before jumping in.

Apple is powerful enough to stand up to overreaching governmental prying, and it has a business model that depends on loyal customers that love the company and its products so much that they are willing to pay more than the going rate for their smartphone.

It also makes sense for the company, from a PR point of view, to act in a way that highlights Google's philosophy. Update, 6 May Up until this point Apple has given the impression that iPhone models equipped with a Secure Enclave - the iPhone 5s and later, in other words, but not the iPhone 5c at the centre of the San Bernardino case - are effectively uncrackable if protected by a passcode, and that even Apple's own staff cannot bypass iOS's anti-brute-force protections.

But a new revelation puts that theory in doubt. According to the LA Times , police hired a hacker earlier this year to break into a passcode-protected iPhone 5s - a device with a Secure Enclave - and the hacker was successful. The phone was owned by April Jace, the victim in a high-profile suspected murder case. This occurred during the same period when Apple and the FBI were disputing whether Apple should be obliged to open up an iPhone 5c in a separate case.

The LAPD's actions are outlined in a search warrant written up by LAPD detective Connie Zych, who stated that the department found a "forensic cellphone expert" who could "override the locked iPhone function". The force has thus far declined to provide any more detail than that - the identity of the expert, the method used, the information recovered - and as with the FBI case, conspiracy theorists will speculate about whether it actually happened.

It's understood that the phone was running iOS 7 or earlier, and thus did not enjoy the additional encryption measures added with iOS 8. But this is still a blow to Apple's reputation as a maker of ultra-private smartphones, at least until more detail emerges. Of course, it's also an eye-opener for anyone who still believed that US law enforcement only wants to break into citizens' phones if they're involved in terrorist plots.

You remember that iPhone everyone was so excited about opening up? It turns out there was nothing useful on there after all. The FBI continues to analyse the data, and may yet make discoveries that aid in the prevention of future attacks, but that must now be unlikely. As it always was, incidentally, given that the attackers were acknowledged to be self-radicalised and not part of a cell. The Washington Post is now alleging that US law enforcement officials didn't hire Cellebrite at all; they hired a team of professional hackers.

Whether this is quite the ethical misstep that the word 'hacker' might imply is debatable: But the fact that the FBI still refuses to tell Apple about the vulnerability that was used to crack the iPhone - and thereby allow it to safeguard the millions of iPhone 5c models around the world from being cracked in the same way - raises broader questions about surveillance culture and the state's approach to its citizens' privacy.

And that seems to be that. As a result of the government's dismissal, neither of these occurred. This case should never have been brought. And presumably on the unstated grounds that it was no longer sure it could win the case, and didn't want to set a precedent. The case is not officially over, but it looks like Apple has won. We offer them our sincere and hopefully not premature congratulations. Both cases depend on the All Writs Act of , and similar arguments are likely to be made when Apple appears again to justify its case against the FBI.

Google's business model is very different to Apple's. Apple sells products, and premium-priced products at that; this is a strategy that depends on loyalty and love from your customers, but requires little sucking up to anyone elseā€¦ except possibly the media. But if you really want those pictures hidden, we recommend using the second part, which will show you a way to really, truly hide photos on iPhone from prying eyes using the Notes app to make a private picture folder on your iPhone.

Master your iPhone in one minute a day: Sign up to iPhone Life's Tip of the Day Newsletter and we'll send you a tip each day to save time and get the most out of your iPhone or iPad. You view hidden albums by opening the Hidden album, which means the security on your Hidden private photos album is next to nothing aside from the passcode to unlock your device in the first place.

To view your hidden photos, tap on the Albums tab in the Photos app. Find the album called Hidden and tap on it. There are a couple steps to really, truly hiding a photo on iPhone. Note that you can't currently lock Notes containing videos, so if you want to know how to hide videos on iPhone, you'll need to skip down to the section on apps that hide photos on iPhone.

When you open Notes up, the photo will be safely locked within Notes.

Master your iPhone in one minute a day:

Leave a Reply