Transmission Control Protocol

UDP vs TCP

TCP vs UDP -What’s The Difference?
Go back to previous article. Get our content first. Whenever a packet is sent, the sender sets a timer that is a conservative estimate of when that packet will be acked. When the legitimate packet is ultimately received, it is found to have the same sequence number and length as a packet already received and is silently dropped as a normal duplicate packet—the legitimate packet is "vetoed" by the malicious packet. Despite their architectural differences, both models have interchangeable transport and network layers and their operation is based upon packet-switched technology. Registered ports are typically used by end user applications as ephemeral source ports when contacting servers, but they can also identify named services that have been registered by a third party. For example, if a PC sends data to a smartphone that is slowly processing received data, the smartphone must regulate the data flow so as not to be overwhelmed.

Navigation menu

TCP and UDP discovery methods

This is negotiated when a connection is established. For more efficient use of high-bandwidth networks, a larger TCP window size may be used. The TCP window size field controls the flow of data and its value is limited to between 2 and 65, bytes. Since the size field cannot be expanded, a scaling factor is used. The TCP window scale option , as defined in RFC , is an option used to increase the maximum window size from 65, bytes to 1 gigabyte.

Scaling up to larger window sizes is a part of what is necessary for TCP tuning. The window scale option is used only during the TCP 3-way handshake. The window scale value represents the number of bits to left-shift the bit window size field. The window scale value can be set from 0 no shift to 14 for each direction independently. Both sides must send the option in their SYN segments to enable window scaling in either direction.

Some routers and packet firewalls rewrite the window scaling factor during a transmission. This causes sending and receiving sides to assume different TCP window sizes. The result is non-stable traffic that may be very slow. The problem is visible on some sites behind a defective router. TCP timestamps are not normally aligned to the system clock and start at some random value.

Many operating systems will increment the timestamp for every elapsed millisecond; however the RFC only states that the ticks should be proportional. PAWS is used when the receive window crosses the sequence number wraparound boundary. In the case where a packet was potentially retransmitted it answers the question: Also, the Eifel detection algorithm RFC uses TCP timestamps to determine if retransmissions are occurring because packets are lost or simply out of order.

TCP timestamps are enabled by default In Linux kernel. It is possible to interrupt or abort the queued stream instead of waiting for the stream to finish. This is done by specifying the data as urgent. This tells the receiving program to process it immediately, along with the rest of the urgent data.

When finished, TCP informs the application and resumes back to the stream queue. An example is when TCP is used for a remote login session, the user can send a keyboard sequence that interrupts or aborts the program at the other end. These signals are most often needed when a program on the remote machine fails to operate correctly.

The signals must be sent without waiting for the program to finish its current transfer. The urgent pointer only alters the processing on the remote host and doesn't expedite any processing on the network itself. When it gets to the remote host there are two slightly different interpretations of the protocol, which means only single bytes of OOB data are reliable.

This is assuming it is reliable at all as it is one of the least commonly used protocol elements and tends to be poorly implemented. This wait creates small, but potentially serious delays if repeated constantly during a file transfer. In the case of telnet, each user keystroke is echoed back by the server before the user can see it on the screen. This delay would become very annoying. Application programs use this socket option to force output to be sent after writing a character or line of characters.

TCP may be attacked in a variety of ways. The results of a thorough security assessment of TCP, along with possible mitigations for the identified issues, were published in , [27] and is currently being pursued within the IETF. By using a spoofed IP address and repeatedly sending purposely assembled SYN packets, followed by many ACK packets, attackers can cause the server to consume large amounts of resources keeping track of the bogus connections.

This is known as a SYN flood attack. Proposed solutions to this problem include SYN cookies and cryptographic puzzles, though SYN cookies come with their own set of vulnerabilities. To do so, the attacker learns the sequence number from the ongoing communication and forges a false segment that looks like the next segment in the stream.

Such a simple hijack can result in one packet being erroneously accepted at one end. When the receiving host acknowledges the extra segment to the other side of the connection, synchronization is lost.

Hijacking might be combined with Address Resolution Protocol ARP or routing attacks that allow taking control of the packet flow, so as to get permanent control of the hijacked TCP connection. Impersonating a different IP address was not difficult prior to RFC , when the initial sequence number was easily guessable. That allowed an attacker to blindly send a sequence of packets that the receiver would believe to come from a different IP address, without the need to deploy ARP or routing attacks: This is why the initial sequence number is now chosen at random.

An attacker who can eavesdrop and predict the size of the next packet to be sent can cause the receiver to accept a malicious payload without disrupting the existing connection. The attacker injects a malicious packet with the sequence number and a payload size of the next expected packet. When the legitimate packet is ultimately received, it is found to have the same sequence number and length as a packet already received and is silently dropped as a normal duplicate packet—the legitimate packet is "vetoed" by the malicious packet.

Unlike in connection hijacking, the connection is never desynchronized and communication continues as normal after the malicious payload is accepted.

TCP veto gives the attacker less control over the communication, but makes the attack particularly resistant to detection. The large increase in network traffic from the ACK storm is avoided. The only evidence to the receiver that something is amiss is a single duplicate packet, a normal occurrence in an IP network.

The sender of the vetoed packet never sees any evidence of an attack. Another vulnerability is TCP reset attack. TCP and UDP use port numbers to identify sending and receiving application end-points on a host, often called Internet sockets. Each side of a TCP connection has an associated bit unsigned port number reserved by the sending or receiving application.

Arriving TCP packets are identified as belonging to a specific TCP connection by its sockets, that is, the combination of source host address, source port, destination host address, and destination port. This means that a server computer can provide several clients with several services simultaneously, as long as a client takes care of initiating any simultaneous connections to one destination port from different source ports. Port numbers are categorized into three basic categories: Well-known applications running as servers and passively listening for connections typically use these ports.

Registered ports are typically used by end user applications as ephemeral source ports when contacting servers, but they can also identify named services that have been registered by a third party. Network Address Translation NAT , typically uses dynamic port numbers, on the "Internet-facing" public side, to disambiguate the flow of traffic that is passing between a public network and a private subnetwork , thereby allowing many IP addresses and their ports on the subnet to be serviced by a single public-facing address.

TCP is a complex protocol. However, while significant enhancements have been made and proposed over the years, its most basic operation has not changed significantly since its first specification RFC in , and the v4 specification RFC , published in September A list of the 8 required specifications and over 20 strongly encouraged enhancements is available in RFC TCP Interactive iTCP [35] is a research effort into TCP extensions that allows applications to subscribe to TCP events and register handler components that can launch applications for various purposes, including application-assisted congestion control.

The redundancy offered by Multipath TCP in the context of wireless networks enables the simultaneous utilization of different networks, which brings higher throughput and better handover capabilities. Multipath TCP also brings performance benefits in datacenter environments.

It is designed to work transparently and not require any configuration. Unlike TLS SSL , tcpcrypt itself does not provide authentication, but provides simple primitives down to the application to do that. As of [update] , the first tcpcrypt IETF draft has been published and implementations exist for several major platforms. It works by skipping the three-way handshake using a cryptographic "cookie". TCP was originally designed for wired networks. Packet loss is considered to be the result of network congestion and the congestion window size is reduced dramatically as a precaution.

However, wireless links are known to experience sporadic and usually temporary losses due to fading, shadowing, hand off, interference , and other radio effects, that are not strictly congestion. After the erroneous back-off of the congestion window size, due to wireless packet loss, there may be a congestion avoidance phase with a conservative decrease in window size.

This causes the radio link to be underutilized. Extensive research on combating these harmful effects has been conducted. Suggested solutions can be categorized as end-to-end solutions, which require modifications at the client or server, [46] link layer solutions, such as Radio Link Protocol RLP in cellular networks, or proxy-based solutions which require some changes in the network without modifying end nodes.

A number of alternative congestion control algorithms, such as Vegas , Westwood , Veno, and Santa Cruz, have been proposed to help solve the wireless problem. The main problem of TOEs is that they are hard to integrate into computing systems, requiring extensive changes in the operating system of the computer or device. One company to develop such a device was Alacritech. A packet sniffer , which intercepts TCP traffic on a network link, can be useful in debugging networks, network stacks, and applications that use TCP by showing the user what packets are passing through a link.

That option dumps all the packets, TCP states, and events on that socket, which is helpful in debugging. Netstat is another utility that can be used for debugging. For many applications TCP is not appropriate.

One problem at least with normal implementations is that the application cannot access the packets coming after a lost packet until the retransmitted copy of the lost packet is received. This causes problems for real-time applications such as streaming media, real-time multiplayer games and voice over IP VoIP where it is generally more useful to get most of the data in a timely fashion than it is to get all of the data in order.

Also, for embedded systems , network booting , and servers that serve simple requests from huge numbers of clients e. Certainly Sir, please provide your home address and telephone number so we can send you the notes you have requested. We accept American Express, Visa and Paypal. This is very helpful. A follow-up question is: Am increased by your knowledge…pliz send mi the differences btw handshake protocols via my Email.

There is nothing to explain more than above. Please give the diff. This is a useful article explaining it all in full details. Other things left are the other protocols that are available or used on the internet. When a file or message send it will get delivered unless connections fails.

If connection lost, the server will request the lost part. There is no corruption while transferring a message. There may be corruption while transferring a message. I like the fact that my computer network teacher brought me here ; i totally found your comments and explanations very useful tho.

Post it on our forum! Send the link below via email or IM Copy. Present to your audience Start remote presentation. Do you really want to delete this prezi? Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

Comments 0 Please log in to add your comment. Die ersten 16 Bits mit den "Rest" addieren 4. Alle Hex-Werte aus dem Header addieren 2. Die ersten 4 Bits mit den "Rest" addieren 3. More presentations by Denzel Kuhlemann Zustandsdiagramm.

One comment

Leave a Reply